Reply Part V to a post from 4/28 [FN1] begins w/reference to a more recent post [FN2, 2a] by 4/28 mentioned in my last blog. 4/28 notes: “So much anti-America self sabotage going on in this country it's truly treasonous. ...” That’s a bit of a reach. “Treason” is a crime 1/19

that the Constitution both defines [FN3] and sets a standard of proof for. [FN4] Contrary to what some believe, “treason” can be committed without formal state of war. [FN5] That is important when someone like…

Hello again and welcome to this 4th segment of my reply to a post from 4/28. [FN1] 4/28 issued a “challenge to any Democrat” to explain how any of a list of statements “makes sense.” A couple of preliminary considerations are important before I continue my reply. [FN2] 1/22

A) 4/28 drafted the statements in a confrontational way. E.g., in the last reply, I noted 2nd part of #9 “is blatantly racist”: [FN3] “any illiterate gang member or terrorist who jumps the southern fence.” That…

This is the 3rd installment of my reply to a “challenge to any Democrat” to explain “how any of this makes sense.” [FN1] The 4/28 challenge consists of 18 unnumbered points [FN2] & I have replied to points 1-6. [FN3] Too often, such vitriol has gone unaddressed. 1/14

4/28 has not marred the post’s free flow of vitriol w/pesky documentation. Many on the far right believe that bluster alone can “win” arguments. I believe these issues need to be addressed & are vital to our…

This is Part 2 of my acceptance of/reply to, a “challenge to any Democrat” to explain “how any of this makes sense without TDS tendencies.” [FN1] What followed were 18 unnumbered points. I’ve addressed 1-3. Before I continue, I need to address a couple of things. 1/13

A) The challenge is “to any Democrat.” I requested a Democratic Party ballot in the most recent 2 primaries & worked at the polls in the 3/17/24, primary election as a Democrat.

B) In my replies to #1-3, I made…