Civil Discourse Now

Where the far left and far right overlap for fun and enlightenment

Mark Small
  • Male
  • United States

Mark Small's Friends

  • Greg Purvis

Gifts Received


Mark Small has not received any gifts yet

Give a Gift


Mark Small's Page

Mark Small's Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

Mark Small's Blog

Hey Morgan! Rob! SCOTUS case 16-1464 and you seek same ends.

Posted on September 24, 2017 at 6:00am 0 Comments

   Morgan Freeman and Rob Reiner are great and courageous to have formed the Committee to Investigate Russia.  Mr. Freeman stated we “have been attacked” and that we “are at war.”

   The evidence of Russian attacks on our 2016 elections is beyond serious question. Russia hacked voting software in at least 21, and perhaps as many as 39, states; paid people in the Trump campaign; and weaponized the internet.

   Russian President Vladimir Putin hates democratic principles and systems.…


Half the Case in 16-1464 has been proven---Special Master should be appointed.

Posted on September 23, 2017 at 6:30am 0 Comments

   Under 1976 Federal case, half the case for voiding the 2016 elections already has been met. At the very least, we need an independent investigation of the election.

   Former Secretary of State Clinton was wrong when she said no mechanism in the Constitution exists to remove a President in office through collusion with a foreign power. 

   In 1976, a U.S. District Court held such action is within the equitable jurisdiction of the court.  Donohue v Bd of Electors, 435 F.Supp 957…


"You can't reverse history"---kind of negates the concept of criminal justice.

Posted on September 22, 2017 at 6:14am 0 Comments

   Yesterday, a person commented to me, “You can’t reverse history.”

   The comment was made in regard to the 2016 elections and Bailey v U.S., docket 16-1464, a case before the U.S. Supreme Court (“SCOTUS”) in which I am counsel for Petitioners who seek an order to nullify those elections. As grounds to nullify, the Petition cites case authority, admissions by the officials named as Respondents that Russia interfered in the election, and acts of treason and a cyber invasion by Russia…


Debate me on the merits of 16-1464---or 'fess up you are "CS.",

Posted on September 21, 2017 at 6:18am 0 Comments

   “Give up or ‘fess up.”

   A California lawyer e-mailed that to me about the challenge to the 2016 election via a Petition for Writ of Mandamus before the Supreme Court. I infer from his eloquent statement he “disses” my argument that the Supreme Court has the authority to void an illegal election (as a District Court held in 1976) under its equitable powers. Const. Art. III, sec.2.

   He did not return my phone calls.

   No one will debate me on the issues in Bailey, et al v…


Comment Wall (2 comments)

You need to be a member of Civil Discourse Now to add comments!

Join Civil Discourse Now

At 6:20am on February 24, 2012, Kurt Lorey said…

Any other guests I should be aware of?

At 6:08am on February 24, 2012, Kurt Lorey said…

I can give it a shot. It would be mainly "shoot from the hip", though.



  • Add Videos
  • View All

© 2017   Created by Mark Small.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service


Live Video

My Great Web page