Civil Discourse Now

Where the far left and far right overlap for fun and enlightenment

If pro sports franchise receives public subsidies, taxpayers shouldn't have to pay to watch its televised games

High % of ppl from all sides agree: pro sports receive too much $ in subsidies. Indy has Colts, Pacers, Indy 11 & The Indy 500. We shouldn’t subsidize billionaires’ hobbies, but that train has sailed (or the ship departed the station). However, taxpayers of any jurisdiction that...1/4

pays public $$$ to subsidize a sport shouldn’t have to pay a 2nd time to watch that specific sport on TV. Example: Colts either be on a regular network or The Colts pay for people to have free service (yes, ESPN) to see the game. This is not a request for a “gift” to viewers. 2/4

We already paid via taxes. If elected I shall introduce a bill to require what I just described. Pro sports can opt out by not asking for more tax $$$. Our potholes, crime & illiteracy R greater problems than billionaires’ salary caps. We’re still paying for The Hoosier Dome. 3/4

We shouldn’t have to pay more to watch games when we pay owners so much. And I’m a sports fan. I’m Mark Small, pro-choice, anti-gun, anti-trump GOP candidate 4 Ind House Distr 86. I approve of this blog. Hell, I wrote it. 4/4

Views: 89

Comment

You need to be a member of Civil Discourse Now to add comments!

Join Civil Discourse Now

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

© 2024   Created by Mark Small.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

My Great Web page