Indiana should not allow rapists to have any rights to visitation, much less extract support, from women whom they have raped & impregnated. That’s what Indiana law allows. Louisiana has set an example of how these laws play out. That this could happen is absurd & evil. IN law: 1/5

woman has sole custody of child born out of wedlock. I.C. 31-14-13-1. If rapist contests, Court determines custody based on child’s best int w/no presumption favoring either parent. Strangers (as in many cases) cannot have pattern of domestic/family viol. I.C. 31-14-13-2. 2/5

Parent w/custody decides kid's upbringing I.C. 31-14-13-4. Court can’t modify custody w/o kid’s best ints + subst’l change factors. I.C. 31-14-13-6. Woman raped must give rapist phone #s & her home/email addresses. I.C. 31-14-13-10.2. He has rt 2 parenting time No mention? Mom’s 3/5

well being/injuries after rape. Rapist can petition 4 custody & pmt fr rape victim 4 child support. If she misses payments? She could go to jail. Rape, incest, threat to woman’s health, or her free will, it’s WOMAN’S right to decide. If elected I’ll propose IN ban rapists’ parental rights. 4/5

Only someone who views women as inferior can support the present laws. I’m Mark Small: pro-choice, pro environment, pro-science, pro-separation of church & State, anti-gun & GOP candidate for Indiana House District 86. I approve of this blog. Hell, I wrote it. 5/5