The last of 7 points in a Feb 4 email from Indiana GOP chair Hupfer that purport to reply to President Biden’s question “What are Republicans for?” Item 6: “Equality of opportunity, not equality of outcome.” This ignores reality. Teddy Roosevelt, a GOP Pres, saw this. 1/6
TR advocated for "a graduated inheritance tax on big fortunes." He argued that estate taxes are required "to preserve a measurable equality of opportunity." As we have seen, the more wealth goes into fewer hands, the more that wealth will be used to preserve its advantages. 2/6
And let’s cut the crap about “trickle down” economics. A study released in 2020 by David Hope, et al, of the London School of Economics found tax cuts for the rich may not accomplish much more than help the rich keep more of their riches and exacerbate income inequality, 3/6
Education, traditionally a way to advance one’s socioeconomic status, today is a sure source of debt, as much as $200K. Kids can enlist in the military, but with increased use of drones, that avenue might be closed, just like rust belt factories. Education is infrastructure. 4/6
Until the 1960s California students did not pay tuition for college. In the early 1970s instate tuition at I.U. was twenty dollars ($20) per credit hour. We need good post-secondary education. That helps people have equal opportunity, just like Hupfer says he wants. 5/6
We need to drop tuition, at our public colleges & universities, to pre-1980 levels. I’m Mark Small. I’m pro-choice, pro environment & GOP candidate for Indiana House District 86. I approve of this blog. Hell, I wrote it. 6/6
Comment
You're concentrating on the wrong thing. Tuition has risen well above the inflation rate for years. You can't just assume that increased tuition is meritorious and taxpayers should foot the bill. There has to be control of higher education costs. Kudos to former Gov. Daniels for trying to do that at Purdue.
And not everyone should go to college. There is nothing wrong with learning a trade. Many of those people in the trades earn more than those with college degrees. Higher education is about giving people the skills they will use in whatever employment they ultimately pursue in life. Sorry, but I don't buy the liberal arts view of education. It's utter nonsense.
And if taxpayers have to pay for higher education costs, or absorb forgiveness of college debt, there has to be means testing. No way, no how am I going to agree to pay for some billionaire's kid to go to school. And it's not just me. Universal 100% taxpayer funded higher education is highly unpopular and it's never going to be popular.
© 2024 Created by Mark Small. Powered by
You need to be a member of Civil Discourse Now to add comments!
Join Civil Discourse Now