Civil Discourse Now

Where the far left and far right overlap for fun and enlightenment

Every action by trump is void because he gained office via treason

Today in her blog, Heather Cox Richardson details the 2016 election hack whereby Russian Pres Putin handed the Oval Office to trump [FN1] & how White House officials are revisiting Putin’s interference in the 2016 election “to distract voters” from trump/Epstein; one observer 1/8

speculates “Putin might possess ‘some form of the Epstein files’” that trump wants kept secret. [FN2] I’ve said for several years that Putin has “kompromat” [FN3] on trump. [FN4] As the past few months show, trump’s grabbing complete control here to make himself dictator. 2/8

Simply to remove trump from office is not enough. I am familiar w/these issues. In 2017, I was counsel in cases before SCOTUS [FN5] [FN6] challenging validity of the 2016 election. Among grounds cited: violation of the “invasion clause” [FN7] via Russia’s cyber invasion. 3/8

If an election is void, so are acts of its “victor.” At day’s end, trump is protected by 3 SCOTUS justices who cover his treason. Removal of trump from office is not enough. We have to do a re-set to the day before the 2016 election. We can’t let them fill the “camps” they’re building. 4/8

What do I know? After all, I’m suspended from the practice of law. For disclosure & details, read the blogs I list below. [FN8] We are on the eve of, or perhaps already in, civil war. As a pacifist, I have to say: only peaceful means should be employed in resistance. 5/8

Footnotes:
FN1. Heather Cox Richardson, Letters from an American, 8/9/25.
FN2. Id.
FN3. “compromising information that is used to blackmail or discredit a person or group usually for political purposes.” Merriam-Webster, accessed 8/9/25. 6/8

FN4. See, civildiscoursenow “Navalny's murder shows the direction trump would take us,” 2/17/24.
FN5. Blumstein, et al v Pence, et al, 16-907.
FN6. Bailey et al. v. United States, 16-1464.
FN7. Art. IV, sec. 4: The United States shall protect each of the States against “Invasion.” 7/8

FN8. See, civildiscoursenow, “Order of Suspension from Indiana's Supreme Court ... say what?” 4/25/23; “Scriveners errors & hyper technicalities,” 4/26/23; “Suspended for a year yet the justice who denied an extension lacks the integrity to be on The Court,” 4/28/23. 8/8

Views: 4

Comment

You need to be a member of Civil Discourse Now to add comments!

Join Civil Discourse Now

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

© 2025   Created by Mark Small.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

My Great Web page