Civil Discourse Now

Where the far left and far right overlap for fun and enlightenment

flotus on Epstein: how great is her ignorance and when did she realize that her lawyers would prefer that she be clueless?

On 4/9/26, flotus [FN1] stated: “The lies linking we with the disgraceful Jeffrey Epstein need to end today.” [FN2] She has an office in the White House and spoke of a matter, “Epstein”, that is of public concern, [FN3] based on her personal knowledge. [FN4] 1/14

1) The “mean-spirited attempts to defame my reputation.” [FN5] If a remark “involves a matter of public concern, the plaintiff is constitutionally required to prove both the statement’s falsity and the defendant’s fault.” [FN6] She does not identify who said what & when. 2/14

Sheer numbers of “lies” and “mean-spirited” attempts to defame are daunting for someone who first got work here on an “Einstein visa.” [FN7] “Melania” is mentioned 124 times in the index on DOJ’s website. [FN8] Math’s tough, but we need specifics. 3/14

2) “[I]ndividuals and companies have been legally obligated to publicly apologize and retract their lies about me.” [FN9] She provides specifics. (Yay!) [FN10] The “retractions” were not as broad as implied. [FN11] [FN12] [FN13] Another part of the 4/9/26 statement: 4/14

3) Congress should have Epstein’s victims “testify under oath.” [FN14] The women who were Epstein’s AND OTHERS’ victims have testified, sometimes several times, so the call for them to testify “under oath,” is more of a threat. After all, Melania has lawyers... 5/14

who forced individuals & companies to apologize, etc. Epstein’s victims have done enough. Only one person, Maxwell - a woman - has faced charges for Epstein’s crimes. Grand juries should be impaneled to listen to testimony and indict people implicated. After all ... 6/14

She says “I am not a witness or a named witness in connection with any of Epstein’s crimes. My name has never appeared in court documents, depositions, victim statements, or FBI interviews surrounding the Epstein matter.” [FN15] She is mentioned 124 times in files released. 7/14

I’ll try to add more to this tomorrow. I’d liked to celebrate election results in Hungary. We have a long way to go in our fight against a wannabe dictator here. Release ALL the Epstein files. 8/14

Footnotes:
FN1. “First Lady of the United States” is the spouse of the current occupant of the office of potus who is #45 and #47. Presidents Jefferson, Jackson, Van Buren and Arthur were widowers when they took office. Buchanan never married. So this is flotus #41 and #43.
FN2. Text of the speech was accessed on the website of USA Today. 9/14

FN3. Most notably, it is the subject of Federal law. Epstein Files Transparency Act. P.L. 119-38.
FN4. Uncommon for a flotus to inspire references to classic literature. Multiple writers cite the same words from Hamlet, Act III, scene 2, it is rare: “Methinks she doth protest too much.”
FN5. Id., at FN2. 10/14

FN6. Black’s Law Dictionary, New Pocket Ed., (1996), pp. 173-74.
FN7. Alicia A. Caldwell, Chad Day, and Jake Pearson, “Melania Trump modeled in U.S. prior to getting work visa,” PBS News, 11/5/16, accessed 4/12/26.
FN8. U.S. Dept of Justice, “Epstein Library,” accessed 4/12/26.
FN9. Id., at FN2. 11/14

FN10. The Daily Beast, James Carville, and Harper Collins UK. Id. at FN2.
FN11. The Daily Beast: retraction underscored internal standards, not new documentary evidence clearing or implicating anyone. “Which Publications Retracted Claims Linking Melania Trump’s Introduction to Jeffrey Epstein, and Why?” factually, 4/11/26, accessed 4/12/26. 12/14

FN12. Carville: took down video/edited out comments fr episode and apologized. Title retracted: ““The Epstein Connection - Trump & Melania”. Parks, “James Carville apologizes ...” Washington Examiner, 8/8/25, accessed 4/12/26. 13/14

FN13. Harper Collins UK: “Reporting indicates the publisher’s action was framed as a correction of particular, unverified assertions about introductions—not a broad vindication of every claim in the underlying manuscript.” Id., at FN11.
FN14. Id., at FN2.
FN15. Id. 14/14

Views: 5

Comment

You need to be a member of Civil Discourse Now to add comments!

Join Civil Discourse Now

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

© 2026   Created by Mark Small.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

My Great Web page