Comments - If you support "original intent" then you have to be pro-choice (like me) - Civil Discourse Now2024-03-29T01:36:03Zhttp://civildiscoursenow.com/profiles/comment/feed?attachedTo=6316350%3ABlogPost%3A37834&xn_auth=noPaul - a strong central gover…tag:civildiscoursenow.com,2020-03-09:6316350:Comment:376242020-03-09T17:15:35.984ZMark Smallhttp://civildiscoursenow.com/profile/04vjqivrcsdny
<p>Paul - a strong central government was the reason for the 1787 Constitutional Convention. The nature of rights of individuals knows no State lines. </p>
<p>Paul - a strong central government was the reason for the 1787 Constitutional Convention. The nature of rights of individuals knows no State lines. </p> This doesn't make any sense. …tag:civildiscoursenow.com,2020-03-09:6316350:Comment:379322020-03-09T14:46:43.348Zpogden297http://civildiscoursenow.com/profile/pogden297
<p>This doesn't make any sense. If you believe in "original intent," this issue would be left to states as virtually all policy issues were left to states. There is nothing in the U.S. Constitution which suggests abortion would be a federal issue. </p>
<p>This doesn't make any sense. If you believe in "original intent," this issue would be left to states as virtually all policy issues were left to states. There is nothing in the U.S. Constitution which suggests abortion would be a federal issue. </p>